1st - McKeens, 2nd - The Hockey News, 3rd - Hockey The Magazine

McKeens had the best G rank projections out of all forecasters.  They got 84.09 out of 100 points. The Hockey News finished in second place with 83.07 points while Hockey Magazine had 77.28 points for third place.

See 2015/2016 Rankings for a breakdown of other statistical categories rankings.

More information about the ranking process can be found at Our Rationale and The Calculations.


It was extremely close battle for first and second.  The Hockey News had the best G rank predictions for the top 75 players.  McKeens had the best predictions for players ranked 76 to 225.   Hockey Magazine didn’t have any last place finished or first place finishes for any player ranges.  (Figure 1)

Figure 1. G ranking


McKeens had the lowest total absolute error in their G rank predictions.  They were off by 28261.63 spots (Figure 2), an average error of 94.21 spots per player.

Figure 2. Total absolute rank error for all statistical categories